The Growing ‘Posh-Poor Divide’: The Way Affluence and Deprivation Are Found Cheek by Jowl in England.

Within Nunsthorpe, residents occupy properties only several yards from their more affluent neighbours in nearby Scartho village. One six-foot-tall barricade physically separates the two communities in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, sealing off roads and walkways that previously connected them.

“This is the divide between rich and poor,” remarked a resident, aged 37. “It has been there for as long as I’ve known. I doubt they’ll take it down because I suspect they’ll want to mix with us.”

A Stark Pattern Across the Country

Analysis of government figures reveals the extent of disparity can run, at times across little more than a short distance of asphalt, a line of hedges or a barrier. Decades of austerity and underinvestment mean a majority of councils now contain a locality classified as one of the poorest in the country.

This geographical widening of deprivation has led to a sharp increase in the number of locations where deprived and affluent residents end up living side by side. Just a few years ago, only 65 of the poorest areas adjoined one of the least deprived. That figure increased to 119 in the most recent data.

A Wall That Does More Than Separate Space

At this Lincolnshire site, the divide is the biggest in the UK and starkly obvious. The barrier is much more than a symbolic divide; it causes very real difficulties for daily routines.

  • The school commute that ought to take 15-20 minutes turn into an sixty-minute journey.
  • Reaching important amenities like supermarkets, educational facilities and employment centres is hindered.
  • The site can attract antisocial behaviour, with reports of litter being dumped over the wall and related problems.

“You try to maintain a nice house and nice garden, and then you reside facing that,” said one local, gesturing towards the rusted metal wall.

Local Bonds Against a Backdrop of Challenges

Within Centre4, workers stress that support does not recognise addresses. “Where you live is not a reliable indicator of your personal struggles,” explained chief executive Tracey Good.

Regardless of ranking in the most deprived 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, Nunsthorpe boasts a fierce loyalty and sense of togetherness among its inhabitants. Meanwhile, the neighbouring area is classified among the least deprived 10% overall.

A Similar Story: Stanhope in Ashford

This phenomenon is repeated across the country. The Stanhope area in Ashford, Kent, a 1960s housing development, is in the 10% most deprived of neighbourhoods in England. It is closely bordered by large houses built in the 2000s that are in the top 10% for employment and living environment.

“They might have bigger houses, but here there’s a stronger community,” commented a long-term resident, 63. “It’s likely many people in the new builds never even talk to each other.”

The economic divide is clear: an average three-bedroom house sells for about £275,000 on the Stanhope estate, while across the divide comparable properties go for about £410,000.

Locals speak of a palpable sense of neglect. “Our neighbourhood gets ignored,” stated holistic health worker Susan Riley-Nevers. “In this area our facilities have slowly been taken away, and most of the issues we face here are related to poverty.”

The increase in these ‘deprivation divides’ presents a picture of an increasingly segregated society, where prosperity and deprivation are frequently awkwardly in close proximity.

Jordan Maynard
Jordan Maynard

Elena Voss is an experienced journalist specializing in global affairs and economic reporting.