🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to resume atomic talks with the United States as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy worked, and disclosed fresh requests had been made by intermediaries to reopen talks with the American leadership. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is treading a complex route since Iran does not want appear to be operating from a position of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more resilient militarily and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Previous Discussions Abruptly Terminated

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that ended with the American leader asserting the locations had been destroyed. Afterward, Western states used their authority to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iranian officials said they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an local partnership with American involvement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the talks that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Officials stated three times they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Existing Position

Iranian officials declared the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be revived in certain ways if talks resume.

The US president in recent days stated he had been getting signals that Iran desired to restart talks, but privately Iranian officials state they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from the United States either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of inactivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran states negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Political Position

In his speech to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the notion of global regulations, Araghchi said the 12-day war demonstrated the clash could not be resolved by armed force. He asserted the strikes started with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and coordination, making trust hard to reestablish.

Negotiations Continues the Final Answer

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had repeatedly tried to enforce their will during the talks. Dialogue can still be viable and stays the ultimate resolution to resolve disputes, but its requirements, guidelines and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they speak to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and honor, they will obtain a answer in the identical language."

Repair and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the struggle of restoration and recovery, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We learned many lessons from this war; we have discovered our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The installations and equipment, if eliminated, will be restored; what is essential is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but were unable to break. The Iranian people have developed stronger, more integrated, and more backing of the leadership and the country in the wake of this invasion."