🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.